You are hereSelection of relevant papers by IAGP members

Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members

2013
Kravitz B, Forster PM, Jones A, including, Jenkins AKL, et al. Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(19):11,175–11,186. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50856/abstract
Gordon MD, Jonko AK, Forster PM, Shell KM. An observationally based constraint on the water-vapor feedback. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(22):12,435–12,443. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020184/full
2014
IPCC, Forster PM. IPCC Report: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.; 2014 p. . Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
Snape TJ, Forster PM. Decline of Arctic sea ice: Evaluation and weighting of CMIP5 projections. Journal of Geophysical Research [Internet]. 2014;119(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020593/full
Scott CE, Spracklen DV, Forster PM, Carslaw KS, al. E. The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary organic aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2014;14. Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/447/2014/acp-14-447-2014.html
Crook JA, Forster PM. Comparison of surface albedo feedback in climate models and observations. Geophysical Research Letters [Internet]. 2014;41(5). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL059280/full
Corner A, Pidgeon N. Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change [Internet]. 2014;May 2014. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6#
Zelinka MD, Andrews T, Forster PM, Taylor KE. Quantifying components of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres [Internet]. 2014;119(12). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JD021710/abstract
Corner A, Pidgeon N. Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Special Theme Issue ‘Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget’ [Internet]. 2014;372(2031). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031/20140063
IPCC, Forster PM. IPCC Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.; 2014 p. . Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
Sherwood SC, Bony S, Boucher O, Bretherton C, Forster PM, Gregory JM, Stevens B. Adjustments in the forcing-feedback framework for understanding climate change. American Meteorological Society [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00167.1
Windeatt JH, Ross A, Williams P, Forster PM, Mohamad NA, Singh S. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Journal of Environmental Management [Internet]. 2014;146:189–197. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479714003983
2015
Crook JA, Jackson LS, Osprey SM, Forster PM. A Comparison of Temperature and Precipitation Responses to Different Earth Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023269/full
Jackson LS, Crook JA, Jarvis A, Leedal D, Ridgwell A, Vaughan N, Forster PM. Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophys. Res. Lett., [Internet]. 2015;42(4):1223–1231. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL062240/full

IAGP logo

Our Partners

with the support of