You are hereSelection of relevant papers by IAGP members
Selection of relevant papers by IAGP members
. Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review. Surveys in Geophysics [Internet]. 2012;33((3-4) 2012):619-635. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h4733187m4g747l8/
. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Climate Change [Internet]. 2012;3(6). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.197/abstract Abstract
. Géo-ingénierie du climat perspectives britanniques. London; 2012 p. . Available from: http://www.bulletins-electroniques.com/actualites/69387.htm
. ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378013001179
. Appraising Geoengineering: Tyndall Working Paper 153. 153 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/tyndall-working-paper/2012/appraising-geoengineering Abstract
. Uncertainty and Good Practice in Hydrological Prediction. Vatten [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/49399/
. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(11):5380–5552. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50171/abstract
. Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. WIRES Climate Change [Internet]. 2013;5(1). Available from: http://wires.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WiresArticle/wisId-WCC261.html
. Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Special Theme Issue ‘Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget’ [Internet]. 2014;372(2031). Available from: http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031/20140063
. Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering. Climatic Change [Internet]. 2014;May 2014. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-014-1148-6#
. Perceptions of geoengineering:public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Climate Change [Internet]. 2012;3(5):451-466. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.176/abstract
. Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environment Magazine . 2010;(52):26-37.
. Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378013001015
. ‘Experiment Earth?’ Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-02. Cardiff: School of Psychology, Cardiff University [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.understanding-risk.org/ Abstract
. 'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper 11.02. 2011.
. Tropical coral reef habitat in a geoengineered, high-CO2 world. Geophysical Research Letters [Internet]. 2013;40(9):1799–1805 . Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50340/abstract
. A Comparison of Temperature and Precipitation Responses to Different Earth Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD023269/full
. Climate change impacts on future photovoltaic and concentrated solar power energy output. Energy and environmental science [Internet]. 2011;4. Available from: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2011/EE/c1ee01495a
. Comparison of surface albedo feedback in climate models and observations. Geophysical Research Letters [Internet]. 2014;41(5). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014GL059280/full
. Spatial Patterns of Modeled Climate Feedback and Contributions to Temperature Response and Polar Amplification. Journal of Climate [Internet]. 2011;24(14). Available from: http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/2011JCLI3863.1
. A balance between radiative forcing and climate feedback in the modeled 20th century temperature response. Journal of Geophysical Research [Internet]. 2011;116. Available from: http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2011JD015924.shtml
. Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(3). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgrd.50174/full
. Making Climates: Solar Radiation Management and the Ethics of Fabrication. In: Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management . Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management . Lanham, MD; 2012. p. . Available from: https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780739175408
. An observationally based constraint on the water-vapor feedback. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres [Internet]. 2013;118(22):12,435–12,443. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020184/full
. Sea-spray geoengineering in the HadGEM2-ES earth-system model: radiative impact and climate response. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [Internet]. 2012;12. Available from: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/10887/2012/acp-12-10887-2012.html
